A personal care home eviction notice in Pennsylvania isn't the end - here are the resident rights, deadlines and appeal steps Philadelphia families should know.
By Philly Senior Advisor Care Team — Licensing & Memory Care Team · September 5, 2026
Almost nobody reads the discharge section of an admission agreement. Families sign it in a conference room in Roxborough or Bensalem on the worst week of the year, initial fourteen pages, and file the copy in a kitchen drawer. Then, sometimes years later, a plain envelope shows up with a letter saying the home is ending the resident agreement in thirty days. That letter is the moment most people first learn that a personal care home eviction notice in Pennsylvania is a regulated document with resident rights attached to it - not a landlord's decision, and not something that takes effect just because it was mailed.
The distinction matters more than it sounds. A personal care home (PCH) or assisted living residence (ALR) in Pennsylvania is licensed by the Department of Human Services, and the same regulations that govern how a resident is admitted also govern how a resident may be transferred or discharged. A notice that does not meet those requirements is contestable. A notice that does meet them still gives the family a defined window to act rather than a demand to be out by Friday. What almost always determines the outcome is whether the family spends that window packing or spends it asking questions.
The other thing worth understanding on day one: the home's business office and the home's administrator are frequently not on the same page about why the notice went out. In our experience the reason written on the letter and the reason a family hears verbally in the hallway can differ, and only the written one has any legal weight.
Personal care homes operate under 55 Pa. Code Chapter 2600 and assisted living residences under Chapter 2800 - two separate licensure categories under the same agency, with the ALR rules generally requiring a higher level of service capacity. Both chapters contain transfer and discharge provisions, and both are built on the same premise: a licensed home that has agreed to care for someone cannot simply decide it would rather not. Discharge has to rest on a stated reason, be delivered in writing, and generally give the resident and the responsible party advance notice - commonly thirty days, with narrower exceptions where an emergency or an immediate safety issue is involved. Because regulatory text is amended over time, read the current section text on the Pennsylvania Code site rather than relying on any summary, including this one.
A compliant notice does more than announce a date. It should identify the specific reason for the discharge, say where the home proposes the resident go, and tell the resident how to contest it. If a letter says only that the resident agreement is being terminated, with no reason and no appeal information, that is not a technicality to shrug at - it is the strongest argument the family has, and it is the first thing an ombudsman will look for.
There is one more provision families routinely miss: a discharge is supposed to be planned, not merely announced. A home that has decided a resident's needs exceed what it is licensed to provide still has an obligation to participate in arranging a safe destination. Practically, that means the home's staff should be making calls alongside you, not handing you a printed list of phone numbers and wishing you luck.
In Greater Philadelphia, discharge notices tend to fall into four buckets. The first is that the resident's care needs have risen beyond what the home is licensed or staffed to meet - a resident who now needs skilled nursing, two-person transfers, or clinical wound care that a personal care home is not set up for. The second is behavior that creates a genuine danger to the resident or to others. The third is nonpayment. The fourth is that the home itself is closing, consolidating, or losing its license, which produces a very different set of obligations and usually a longer runway.
The first reason is the one that gets stretched. After a hospitalization at Temple, Einstein, Abington or Doylestown, a resident often comes back needing more help than they left with - and a home that is short-staffed on the memory-care hall may find it easier to describe that as 'needs exceed our license' than to add care hours. Sometimes that assessment is honest and correct; Pennsylvania draws a real line between what a PCH may provide and what requires a nursing facility, and no family is well served by a home that keeps a resident it cannot safely handle. But sometimes it is a staffing decision wearing a regulatory costume. The way to tell the difference is to ask, in writing, exactly which needs the home has determined it cannot meet and which section of its license that determination rests on. A home with a legitimate case answers that in a paragraph. A home without one tends to get vague.
Nonpayment notices deserve their own scrutiny, particularly where a Community HealthChoices plan is involved. CHC can cover personal care services delivered in a PCH or ALR but does not pay room and board, and Pennsylvania's SSI state supplement toward personal care home costs is set well below most private-pay rates. A balance dispute is often a coverage mix-up between the plan, the home's billing office and the family - not an actual refusal to pay. Ask for an itemized ledger before conceding anything.
If the resident is in a skilled nursing facility rather than a personal care home, none of the above is the governing law. Nursing homes in Pennsylvania are licensed by the Department of Health under 28 Pa. Code Chapter 211 and, where Medicare or Medicaid certified, are also bound by federal requirements that give residents comparatively robust transfer and discharge protections - including limits on permissible reasons, written notice with an explanation of appeal rights, and the right to a state-level hearing.
This distinction trips families up constantly, because the buildings can look identical from the parking lot and marketing language blurs the categories. A campus in Media or Lansdale may hold a personal care home license on one wing and a nursing home license on another, with different regulators, different inspection records and different discharge rules on either side of a fire door. Before you argue about rights, confirm which license the resident actually lives under - the DHS facility locator covers personal care homes and assisted living residences, the Department of Health's facility search covers nursing homes, and Medicare's Care Compare covers certified nursing facilities.
Getting this right also changes who you complain to. A discharge grievance about a personal care home goes to DHS. The same grievance about a nursing home goes to the Department of Health. Sending it to the wrong agency does not usually get forwarded - it gets closed.
The Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, housed within the Department of Aging and delivered locally through the area agencies on aging, is the first call and the most underused. In Philadelphia - a consolidated city-county, so there is no separate county office to track down - ombudsman services run through the Philadelphia Corporation for Aging. In the collar counties it is Montgomery County Aging and Adult Services, the Bucks County Area Agency on Aging, the Delaware County Office of Services for the Aging, and Chester County Department of Aging Services. Ombudsmen are free, they are not employed by the facility, and they read these notices for a living. Many discharge notices are withdrawn after an ombudsman simply asks the administrator to explain the regulatory basis.
The second call is a licensing complaint to DHS if the notice appears defective or the reason appears pretextual. The third, if there is any indication of neglect, retaliation or unsafe transfer, is Pennsylvania's statewide elder abuse reporting line at 1-800-490-8505; confirm the current number when you call, since statewide numbers do change. If a discharge is being tied to a hospital stay, loop in the hospital's discharge planning department at Penn Medicine, Jefferson, Temple, Einstein, Nazareth, Lankenau, Bryn Mawr, Paoli or Grand View - they negotiate with facilities weekly and often know which homes in Montgomery or Delaware County have an open bed at the right level of care.
Photograph the notice and the envelope, including the postmark, because deadlines usually run from a date someone will later dispute. Request the resident's current assessment and service plan in writing - a home that has decided the resident's needs exceed its license should have documentation supporting that, and its absence is informative. Ask, again in writing, for the appeal instructions if the letter did not include them. Call the ombudsman before you call a lawyer; it is faster, free, and the ombudsman's involvement is itself a signal to the home.
At the same time, begin a parallel search rather than betting everything on the appeal. Greater Philadelphia assisted living generally runs roughly 4,800 to 6,900 dollars a month in 2026, with memory care higher and Main Line, Chester County and parts of Bucks skewing to the top of the range while North and Northeast Philadelphia and parts of Delaware County tend to run lower. Availability at the right care level moves faster than pricing does. Families who contest a notice and also tour three alternatives end up with leverage; families who do only one of those end up with whatever is left.
Finally, keep the resident's own voice in it. A competent adult has the right to participate in decisions about where they live, and a discharge process that has been conducted entirely between a facility and an adult child is one that has already skipped a step.
Free, online, and no pressure — we answer to families here, not to facilities.
Or call (855) 768-7212